Sunday, December 26, 2010

Even After Shellacking, 2012 Looks Okay for Obama

Michael Barone in today’s Washington Examiner:

On Boxing Day, it’s worth noting that Barack Obama is down but not out.

You could tell as much from the contrast between his petulant postelection press conference and his peppy pre-Christmas press conference. In the former he was crabby about accepting Republicans’ demands that income tax rates on all taxpayers not be raised. In the latter he was celebrating the lame-duck Congress’ acceptance of his stands on the New START treaty, repeal of “don’t ask, don’t tell,” and even the previously reviled tax deal.

Obama has obviously figured out that Americans prefer to see their president describe the glass as half full rather than half empty. That’s a good lesson for him, and for Republicans as well, especially those who believe that the Obama Democrats’ shellacking in the midterms means that Obama himself will definitely lose in 2012.

History should provide some caution for these folks.

Jimmy Carter and George H.W. Bush saw their parties fare pretty well in their midterm elections. But they were defeated for re-election anyway.

In contrast, pundits thought that Ronald Reagan’s Republicans took a shellacking in 1982 (actually, about half their losses resulted from redistricting) and Bill Clinton’s Democrats definitely did in 1994. But both the 40th and 42nd presidents were resoundingly re-elected, carrying 49 and 31 states.

Several factors will likely work less strongly against Obama in 2012 than against the Obama Democrats in 2010. Turnout will be different, for one thing. We may see again the record turnout of blacks we saw in 2008. Young people who pretty much shunned the polls in the midterms may turn out and vote — though the 34-point margin they gave to Obama was halved to 17 points for congressional Democrats in 2010.

The balance of enthusiasm favored Republicans and conservatives in 2010, as it had favored Democrats in 2006 and 2008. It could conceivably shift and favor the Democrats once again.

Another factor is that polls show that most Americans have favorable personal feelings toward the president. Bill Clinton and George W. Bush both happened to have personal characteristics that people on the other side of the cultural divide absolutely loathed. Obama doesn’t.

Read the whole thing here.

Source: "Big Government" via Glen in Google Reader

No comments:

Post a Comment

iPhone 4 Unlocked Amazon

Angels

  • Mysterious Ways - Miracles The Old Testament is full of displays of God’s power—protecting Daniel in the lions’ den, the parting of the Red Sea, the ten plagues of Egypt. T...
    9 years ago
  • Prayer Stories - Prayer stories nurture faith and renew hope. The power of prayer can't be denied. Prayer can change circumstances or change perspectives, transforming li...
    9 years ago
  • - *[unable to retrieve full-text content]*
    9 years ago
  • - *[unable to retrieve full-text content]*
    9 years ago
  • - *[unable to retrieve full-text content]*
    9 years ago
  • - *[unable to retrieve full-text content]*
    9 years ago
  • - *[unable to retrieve full-text content]*
    9 years ago
  • Better Living - One key to better living is to look for wisdom in many places. Heeding wise words of life advice can help improve your health, increase your sense of wel...
    9 years ago
  • Pets - Those who have pets in their lives know the tremendous power of these healing animals to bring about feelings of peace, connection, and love. Cats, dogs,...
    9 years ago
  • Daily Devotions - A daily devotional is a trusted guide, and it is an invitation to nurture your spiritual life. Devotionals include a Bible verse, a reflection on that ve...
    9 years ago
  • - *[unable to retrieve full-text content]*
    9 years ago
  • - *[unable to retrieve full-text content]*
    9 years ago
  • - *[unable to retrieve full-text content]*
    9 years ago